Monday, March 28, 2011

Data-sharing by VIN protects repair facilities, insurers and owners

(Reproduced from story I wrote for Collision Management Magazine January 2011 Issue)
The vehicle identification number, or VIN, used on all cars and trucks today became a standardized 17-digit number in 1981.  The numbers and letters are codes for such things as the make and model, model year, and a final six-digit sequence that identifies the specific vehicle.  It’s the vehicle’s “fingerprint,” and when used on repairs and shared between collision facilities, insurance companies, police and the public, it can provide a level of protection for all of them.
Improving the accuracy
Insurance companies recorded VINs on their policies early on, but not with much accuracy or consistency, especially since VIN decoding and verification software wasn’t readily available twenty years ago.  But in the mid-1990’s, the insurance industry and Ontario’s Ministry of Transportation began work on the Uninsured Vehicles (UV) Project to verify that vehicles carried mandatory insurance.  Starting last fall, the project was phased in to alert vehicle owners of potential VIN issues prior to their license plate renewals.  It is expected to expand in future, allowing police to access the insurance database to verify insurance coverage at roadside.
What the UV project initially found was that many companies were entering VINs incorrectly, with some well below 50 percent accuracy.  This was usually due to it being manually entered, where characters could be missed or mixed up.  The UV initiative accelerated the process of insurers cleaning up their VINs, with a goal of better than 99 per cent accuracy.
CLEAR thinking
The timing coincided with other industry initiatives, including insurers moving to a new, experience-based vehicle rating system called Canadian Loss Experience Automobile Rating, or CLEAR.  Using historical insurance data by vehicle model, CLEAR bases each  model’s expected costs on such factors as theft rates, repair costs and frequency of injuries.  In conjunction with CLEAR, new products were being developed, including decoding software that would ensure VIN accuracy and let insurers know they were properly rating the vehicle.
An accurate VIN lets the industry better verify other information, such as if the vehicle had been previously branded as irreparable, salvage, rebuilt or stolen.
Data Sharing has enormous potential
Data sharing through the VIN has enormous potential for the industry.  Collision facility owners can access information that would identify areas of previous damage, which can potentially protect shops – and the car’s owner – when it comes to the vehicle’s structural integrity.  Claims fraud can potentially decrease as insurers are able to trace the vehicle’s history, and vehicle buyers can follow a car’s travels through any insurance claims or collision repairs, as well as check the accuracy of its odometer reading and any service records.

Vehicle history reports are now available to car buyers, and collision repair facilities maintaining accurate VIN records of their repairs will help make this information part of the package.  This may even help drive consumers to facilities prominently displayed on the report to ensure they maintain their vehicle’s value following a collision.  There’s a lot of value in those 17 digits at every step of a vehicle’s life.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Dare to take the plunge!



Whether you need to deal with new technology, compliance issues, analytics opportunities or overall innovation within your organization, don't be afraid to take the plunge with confidence... but be sure you are properly prepared, and enjoy the ride!  


Yes, that's me in the picture.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Due diligence for commercial risks


Do you wonder if some regulatory rules such as the upcoming Solvency II or requirements such as the OECD’s Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Recommendation 5: Customer due diligence and record-keeping, are something that would impact a Property and Casualty Insurance organization. 

Specifically when it comes to verification of beneficiaries before issuing payments (stated as protecting policyholders and beneficiaries), by verifying information such as in ownership, articles of incorporation, business names, bankruptcy, litigation (history and pending), etc. for current or potential risks.  Apparently, some financial institutions don’t even ask the policyholder for the information, but rather automatically go to a third party to get that information.  This is to avoid any possibility of getting incorrect, outdated or falsified documents.

The OECD requirements outlined FATF Recommendation 5 which affects all insurance and financial institutions globally. There are a lot of requirements regarding Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and about insurance companies’ need to confirm identification of policyholders and beneficiaries.  For example, bullet a): “Identifying the customer and verifying that customer’s identity using reliable, independent source documents, data or information”.

I wonder if companies think about this at all, or to what degree, if they do.  There are service providers that currently provide much of this information to life insurers and banks, but not very many P&C insurers at this time.  Maybe this will change with time.

My take on this is that by acquiring the information for all risks at the underwriting level, you would be able to do an analysis on commercial risks to find a relationship between corporate profiles and loss experience, and then possibly get automatic updates (like credit score updates for consumers) for any changes in a commercial enterprise.  The information would also then be available for claims investigations 100% of the time rather than only once in a while.

Food for thought, but drop me a line if you have any thoughts on this.

Roch